Florida Forensic Science
  • Chemistry & Trace Evidence
  • Toxicology
  • Patterned Evidence
  • Biology
  • Digital Forensics
  • Medical Trauma
  • Crime Lab Information
  • Eyewitness Identification
  • Reviews
  • News
  • Terminology
  • Ask An Expert
  • Events
    • Forensic Science Friday
      • October 2018
      • April 2018
      • July 2017
      • April 2017
    • DNA Boot Camp
    • Strengthening Forensic Science
    • Daubert Training
  • Menu Menu
  • All
  • Digital Forensics
  • Forensic Biology
  • Forensic Chemistry
  • Forensic Toxicology
  • Patterned Evidence
  • Crime Lab

Review: Web Browser Forensics: Google Chrome

October 25, 2017/in Digital Forensics Reviews, Reviews /by Public Defender 9th Circuit

Emily C. Lennert   Category Digital Keywords Google, Chrome, web, Internet, browser, digital, artifacts, cyber, RAM, Incognito, private Article Reviewed Rathod, D. Web browser forensics: Google Chrome. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science. 2017, 8(7). Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this review are an interpretation of the research presented in the article. These […]

Read more
http://www.floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/laptoppen.jpeg 2667 4000 Public Defender 9th Circuit http://floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/forensic-logo1-1030x153.png Public Defender 9th Circuit2017-10-25 11:37:482018-02-05 12:32:07Review: Web Browser Forensics: Google Chrome

Review: Image Forgery Localization via Fine-Grained Analysis of CFA Artifacts

August 16, 2017/in Digital Forensics Reviews, Reviews /by Public Defender 9th Circuit

Emily C. Lennert   Category Digital Keywords image, tampering, forgery, localization, detection, color filter array, CFA, demosaicking, artifacts, resampling Article Reviewed Ferrara, P.; Bianchi, T.; De Rosa, A.; Piva, A. Image forgery localization via fine-grained analysis of CFA artifacts. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. 2012, 7(5), 1566-1577. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this […]

Read more
http://www.floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/image-editing.jpeg 750 1125 Public Defender 9th Circuit http://floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/forensic-logo1-1030x153.png Public Defender 9th Circuit2017-08-16 14:24:202018-07-18 11:52:29Review: Image Forgery Localization via Fine-Grained Analysis of CFA Artifacts

Review: Smart TV Forensics: Digital Traces on Televisions

May 31, 2017/in Digital Forensics Reviews, Reviews /by Public Defender 9th Circuit

Emily C. Lennert   Category: Digital Keywords: smart TV, television, USB, flash drive, internet, video, social networking, streaming Article to be reviewed: Boztas, A.; Riethoven, A.R.J.; Roeloffs, M. Smart TV forensics: digital traces on televisions. Digital Investigation. 2015, 12, S72-S80. Additional Reference(s): What is open source? https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-source (accessed Mar 29, 2017). Disclaimer: The opinions expressed […]

Read more
http://www.floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/tv.jpeg 1124 2000 Public Defender 9th Circuit http://floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/forensic-logo1-1030x153.png Public Defender 9th Circuit2017-05-31 14:20:382018-02-05 12:35:35Review: Smart TV Forensics: Digital Traces on Televisions

Review: Digital Forensic Analyses of Web Browser Records

May 17, 2017/in Digital Forensics Reviews, Reviews /by Public Defender 9th Circuit

Emily C. Lennert   Category: Digital Keywords: web browser, internet, search, history, cache, cookies, downloads, data recovery, URL, Software Programs, Internet Providers Article to be reviewed: Akhbal, E.; Günes, F.; Akbal, A. Digital forensic analyses of web browser records. Journal of Software. 2016, 11 (7), 631-637. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this review are an […]

Read more
http://www.floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/laptop.jpeg 2667 4000 Public Defender 9th Circuit http://floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/forensic-logo1-1030x153.png Public Defender 9th Circuit2017-05-17 13:05:262018-07-18 11:29:10Review: Digital Forensic Analyses of Web Browser Records

Review: Network and Device Forensic Analysis of Android Social-Messaging Applications

March 15, 2017/in Digital Forensics Reviews, Reviews /by Forensic Competency

Emily C. Lennert Category: Digital Keywords: social media, instant messaging, Android, network, mobile, Facebook, messaging, messenger, Kik, Instagram, Snapchat, ooVoo, Tango, Nimbuzz, textPlus Article to be reviewed: Walnycky, D.; Baggili, I.; Marrington, A.; Moore, J.; Breitinger, F. Network and device forensic analysis of Android social-messaging applications. Digital Investigation. 2015. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this […]

Read more
http://www.floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Blank-Cellphone.jpg 987 1063 Forensic Competency http://floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/forensic-logo1-1030x153.png Forensic Competency2017-03-15 20:54:052018-02-05 12:37:41Review: Network and Device Forensic Analysis of Android Social-Messaging Applications

Review: Digital Forensics Investigation for Social Networks

February 15, 2017/0 Comments/in Digital Forensics Reviews, Reviews /by Forensic Competency

Emily C. Lennert, Candice Bridge, Ph.D Category: Digital Evidence Keywords: social network, digital, digital evidence, mobile device, personal computer, imaging, data, recovery Article to be reviewed: 1. Jang, Y.-J.; Kwak, J. “Digital forensics investigation methodology applicable for social network services.” Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2015, 74 (14), 5029–5040. Additional references: 2. What is volatile data? […]

Read more
http://www.floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/7975205041.png 751 1024 Forensic Competency http://floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/forensic-logo1-1030x153.png Forensic Competency2017-02-15 20:24:512018-02-05 12:38:23Review: Digital Forensics Investigation for Social Networks
  • Reviews Biology
  • Reviews Chemistry
  • Reviews Crime Lab
  • Reviews Digital Forensics
  • Reviews Patterned Evidence
  • Reviews Toxicology

Read More Articles

  • A Case Study of Two Arson ExonerationsAugust 17, 2020 - 9:27 am
  • DNA Database HackedJuly 30, 2020 - 3:12 pm
  • A DNA Mix-Up Involving a Washing Machine Kept a Man in Jail for 3 YearsJune 29, 2020 - 2:24 pm
  • June 25, 2020 - 2:18 pm
  • FREE Webinar: Pediatric Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners: Roles, Responsibilities and the New National Pediatric SAFE Protocol – July 15 at 2 PMJune 18, 2020 - 3:48 pm
  • Winter Park Police Start Using Body Cameras for 1st TimeJune 15, 2020 - 11:08 am
  • IBM Quits Facial Recognition, Joins Call for Police ReformsJune 11, 2020 - 3:46 pm
  • In Florida, A Haze Builds Around Pot Law Enforcement as Technology Catches Up to PolicyFebruary 25, 2020 - 10:43 am
  • Trump Administration Targets Your ‘Warrant-Proof’ Encrypted MessagesFebruary 24, 2020 - 5:03 pm
  • Morgan & Morgan Firm Joins State Attorney, Public Defender to Launch Community Bail FundFebruary 20, 2020 - 2:15 pm

Contact Our Office

Office of the Public Defender
435 North Orange Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801

Driving Directions

407-836-4800

ACCESSIBILITY

The Orange County Public Defender is committed to ensuring that persons with disabilities have access to its website.  If the format of any material on our website is not accessible due to a disability, please e-mail PDADCoordinator@circuit9.org or call (407) 836-4806.

  • Crime Lab Information
  • Digital Forensics
  • Biology
  • Chemistry & Trace Evidence
  • Toxicology
  • Patterned Evidence
  • Home

Copyright 2020, Public Defender, Ninth Judicial Circuit. The material found on this web site is for informational purposes only. It should not be considered to be legal advice and is not guaranteed to be complete or up to date. Use of this web site is not intended to create, nor constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not rely upon or act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Scroll to top