Contact Our Office
Office of the Public Defender
435 North Orange Avenue
Orlando, FL 32801
ACCESSIBILITY
The Orange County Public Defender is committed to ensuring that persons with disabilities have access to its website. If the format of any material on our website is not accessible due to a disability, please e-mail PDADCoordinator@circuit9.org or call (407) 836-4806.
Copyright 2020, Public Defender, Ninth Judicial Circuit. The material found on this web site is for informational purposes only. It should not be considered to be legal advice and is not guaranteed to be complete or up to date. Use of this web site is not intended to create, nor constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not rely upon or act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
Review: Visualizing Indented Writing on Thermal Paper by the Controlled Application of Heat
/in Patterned Evidence Reviews, Reviews /by Public Defender 9th CircuitEmily C. Lennert Category Patterned Evidence Keywords indented writing, thermal paper, receipt paper, latent evidence Article Reviewed Johnson, M.; Bond, J. W. Visualizing indented writing on thermal paper by the controlled application of heat. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2017, 62(5), 1366-1371. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this review are an interpretation of the research […]
Review: A Noninvasive and Speculative Method of Visualizing Latent Fingerprint Deposits on Thermal Paper
/in Patterned Evidence Reviews, Reviews /by Public Defender 9th CircuitEmily C. Lennert Category Patterned Evidence Keywords fingerprint, latent, visualization, noninvasive, speculative, thermal paper, receipt paper Article Reviewed Bond, J. W. A noninvasive and speculative method of visualizing latent fingerprint deposits on thermal paper. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2015, 60(4), 1034-1039. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this review are an interpretation of the research […]
Review: Forensic Identification of Gender from Fingerprints
/in Biology Reviews, Chemistry Reviews, Patterned Evidence Reviews, Reviews /by Public Defender 9th CircuitEmily C. Lennert Category Biology, Chemistry, Patterned Evidence Keywords fingerprint, male, female, identification, gender, biological, sex, amino acid, protein, extraction, enzyme, assay Article Reviewed Huynh, C.; Brunelle, E.; Halámková, L.; Agudelo, J.; Halámek, J. Forensic identification of gender from fingerprints. Analytical Chemistry. 2015, 87, 11531-11536. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this review are an […]
Review: A Novel Method for the Photographic Recovery of Fingermark Impressions from Ammunition Cases Using Digital Imaging
/in Patterned Evidence Reviews, Reviews /by Public Defender 9th CircuitEmily C. Lennert Category Pattern Keywords fingerprint, latent, ammunition, cartridge, shell, casing, photography, imaging Article Reviewed Porter, G.; Ebeyan, R.; Crumlish, C.; Renshaw, A. A novel method for the photographic recovery of fingermark impressions from ammunition cases using digital imaging. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2015, 60 (2), 418-421. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this review […]
Review: Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Latent Fingerprint Decisions
/in Patterned Evidence Reviews, Reviews /by Forensic CompetencyEmily C. Lennert Category: patterned evidence Keywords: fingerprints, latent, reliability, accuracy, error, false positive, false negative Article to be reviewed: Ulery, B. T.; Hicklin, R. A.; Buscaglia, J.; Roberts, M. A. “Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2011, 108 (19), 7733–7738. Additional references: Strengthening Forensic Science […]
Review: Objective Analysis of Impressed Chisel Toolmarks
/in Patterned Evidence Reviews, Reviews /by Forensic CompetencyEmily C. Lennert Category: Patterned Evidence Keywords: patterned, comparison, toolmarks, striations, impression Article to be reviewed: 1. Spotts, R.; Chumbley, L. S. “Objective analysis of impressed chisel toolmarks.” Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2015, 60 (6), 1436–1440. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this review are an interpretation of the research presented in the article. These opinions […]